Finnish economy 2040

Public finance simulator

Cause-and-effect chains

Changes to spending and taxes have indirect consequences: a cut can partly come back as other costs, and a tax rise can change behaviour. This page lists every effect in the model with its assumptions and evidence. Disputed and speculative effects are off by default.

Showing 29 of 29

What affects what

When you change……it leads to……which changes the line
Health
Social protection (incl. pensions)
Economic affairs and transport: Transport
Education
All earned and capital income taxes
Corporate tax rate (18% from 2027)
Income taxes of high earners (top decile)
Income taxes of low and middle incomes
General VAT rate (now 25.5%)
Alcohol excise
Government's social security cuts
Health: Outpatient care
General public services (excl. interest): Basic research
Economic affairs and transport: Research and development
Social protection (incl. pensions): Old age (elderly care services)
Education: Student aid
Capital income taxes
Health: hospital services
Social protection: sickness and disability
Social protection: social assistance and other social exclusion
Economic affairs: transport
Personal income tax
Corporate income tax
Value added tax
Alcohol excise
Social protection: families and children (incl. early childhood education)
Social protection: unemployment

Point at a box (or tap it) to highlight what it is connected to. Red border = disputed, dashed = off by default. Click an effect's name to open it.

All effects

Deferred care raises health costs

Confidence: Low
On by default

When health care is cut, queues grow and conditions worsen. Part of the saving comes back later as costlier treatment, and that part grows as long as the cut continues.

Maintenance backlog grows

Confidence: Low
On by default

When maintenance of roads and railways is cut, repairs get more expensive later and part of the saving returns as a growing cost.

⚠ Education cuts weaken future tax revenue

Confidence: Speculative
Off by default

When education is cut, skills and productivity weaken after several years, which lowers future wages and tax revenue.

⚠ Income tax changes work and reported income

Confidence: Medium
Off by default

When income tax is raised, some people work less or shift income to lower-taxed forms, so revenue grows less than the static estimate. A cut works the other way.

⚠ Corporate tax moves investment, profits and activity abroad

Confidence: Low
Off by default

When corporate tax is raised, firms invest less in Finland, shift profits to lower-tax countries and some move activity abroad over a few years, so part of the extra revenue disappears. With a cut, part of the loss comes back.

Lower consumption weakens company profits

Confidence: Low
On by default

When people on low and middle incomes spend less, company sales and profits fall, which lowers corporate tax revenue. Wider effects on jobs and growth will be added later with multiplier effects.

Higher income taxes cut consumption and VAT revenue

Confidence: Medium
On by default

When everyone's income taxes rise, consumption falls, especially among low and middle incomes, and VAT revenue is lost. The effect is smaller than for a rise on low and middle incomes alone, because high earners save more of their income.

A VAT increase reduces consumption

Confidence: Low
On by default

When VAT is raised, prices rise and consumption falls somewhat, so revenue grows less than the static estimate.

⚠ Benefit cuts raise employment

Confidence: Low
Off by default

The government estimates that social security cuts encourage work, which raises tax revenue after a few years. If the cuts are reversed, this effect is lost.

Outpatient care cuts raise disability pensions

Confidence: Low
On by default

When outpatient care – for example primary care and mental-health services – is cut, some illnesses drag on and lead to a disability pension a few years later. The increase shows in sickness and disability spending.

Poverty raises the need for child welfare and family support

Confidence: Speculative
Off by default

When social security is cut, poverty deepens among the lowest-income families. Research links child poverty to the need for child welfare and later problems, so part of the saving comes back over the years as spending on family and children's services.

⚠ Basic research cuts weaken future productivity

Confidence: Speculative
Off by default

When basic research is cut, less new knowledge and innovation emerges, which slows productivity growth and lowers wages and tax revenue after a long lag. Finland has a statutory target of raising R&D spending to 4% of GDP by 2030.

⚠ Cuts to business R&D support weaken future tax revenue

Confidence: Speculative
Off by default

When research and development support for business (for example Business Finland funding) is cut, firms do less product development, which slows productivity and lowers later profits, wages and tax revenue.

Elderly care cuts block hospital beds

Confidence: Low
On by default

When elderly care (service housing, home care) is cut, some older people have to wait in hospital for a care place. A hospital day costs about twice a day in service housing, so part of the saving comes back as health spending within the same year.

Student aid cuts make students work more

Confidence: Low
On by default

When student aid is cut, some students make up for it by working more. Their wages are taxed, so part of the saving comes back as tax revenue straight away. (Some take a student loan instead, and some spend less.)

⚠ Student aid cuts slow down graduation

Confidence: Speculative
Off by default

When students work more alongside their studies, some graduate later and some drop out. Skilled workers enter jobs matching their education later, which lowers tax revenue after several years.

Health staff cuts raise unemployment spending

Confidence: Low
On by default

When health care spending is cut, part of the saving comes from staff: some employees are dismissed or their fixed-term contracts are not renewed. They receive unemployment benefit until they find new work – most within a year – so the effect is largest in the first year and then fades. A change to medicines and equipment doesn't trigger it, as no own staff are involved. Extra spending works the other way, but probably less strongly, as new staff are often hired from other jobs.

Health staff cuts lower tax and contribution revenue

Confidence: Low
On by default

When health care spending is cut and some employees become unemployed, they pay no income tax or social contributions on a wage, and no employer pension or other social contributions are paid for them, until they find new work. The effect is largest in the first year and then fades. A change to medicines and equipment doesn't trigger it, as no own staff are involved. Extra spending works the other way, but probably less strongly.

Education staff cuts raise unemployment spending

Confidence: Low
On by default

When education spending is cut, part of the saving comes from staff: some employees are dismissed or their fixed-term contracts are not renewed. They receive unemployment benefit until they find new work – most within a year – so the effect is largest in the first year and then fades. A change to student aid doesn't trigger it, as it is a cash benefit. Extra spending works the other way, but probably less strongly, as new staff are often hired from other jobs.

Education staff cuts lower tax and contribution revenue

Confidence: Low
On by default

When education spending is cut and some employees become unemployed, they pay no income tax or social contributions on a wage, and no employer pension or other social contributions are paid for them, until they find new work. The effect is largest in the first year and then fades. A change to student aid doesn't trigger it, as it is a cash benefit. Extra spending works the other way, but probably less strongly.

Elderly care staff cuts raise unemployment spending

Confidence: Low
On by default

When elderly care spending is cut, part of the saving comes from staff: some employees are dismissed or their fixed-term contracts are not renewed. They receive unemployment benefit until they find new work – most within a year – so the effect is largest in the first year and then fades. Extra spending works the other way, but probably less strongly, as new staff are often hired from other jobs.

Elderly care staff cuts lower tax and contribution revenue

Confidence: Low
On by default

When elderly care spending is cut and some employees become unemployed, they pay no income tax or social contributions on a wage, and no employer pension or other social contributions are paid for them, until they find new work. The effect is largest in the first year and then fades. Extra spending works the other way, but probably less strongly.